Digital ballot images made public under Georgia’s new voting law show nearly 200 ballots — including one for West — that election officials initially scanned two times last fall before a recount. There’s no indication any vote for president was counted more than once in official results.
The discovery of identical ballots provides evidence to back up allegations of problems in the presidential election, but on a relatively small scale that had no bearing on the final certified count. A group of voters seeking to prove the election was fraudulent say double-counting is just the beginning of what they hope to find.
“If we’re finding this in Fulton County, we’re probably going to find it throughout the state. The question is, why did it happen?” said David Cross, an investment manager working with the plaintiffs. “The simple fact that it happened and we found it here means that it probably occurred elsewhere.”
The ballots counted twice would have given Biden 27 extra votes. After a recount, official results reflected that Trump gained a total of 121 absentee votes in Fulton. Biden won the county with 73% of 524,000 votes cast.
The most obvious example of duplicates in the initial count occurred in a batch of 99 ballots first scanned the morning of Oct. 28, then scanned again about an hour later, with the second batch tallied in exact reverse order from the first. Those batches had 58 votes for Biden, 39 for Trump, one for Libertarian Jo Jorgensen and one for West.
Part or all of another batch of 98 ballots appeared to be scanned a second time within minutes on election night. Biden received 55 votes in the first of those batches and 56 in the second batch. Many of the ballots appeared to be identical.
“It’s something that should never happen,” said Mark Lindeman, acting co-director for Verified Voting, an election integrity organization focused on voting technology. “I’m not trying to make excuses for a blunder, but under really difficult circumstances, people do things that are inexplicable, and that seems to be the case here.”
Overdose deaths soared to a record 93,000 last year in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. government reported Wednesday.
That estimate far eclipses the high of about 72,000 drug overdose deaths reached the previous year and amounts to a 29% increase.
“This is a staggering loss of human life,” said Brandon Marshall, a Brown University public health researcher who tracks overdose trends.
The nation was already struggling with its worst overdose epidemic but clearly “COVID has greatly exacerbated the crisis,” he added.
Lockdowns and other pandemic restrictions isolated those with drug addictions and made treatment harder to get, experts said.
Fentanyl was involved in more than 60% of the overdose deaths last year, CDC data suggests.
There’s no current evidence that more Americans started using drugs last year, Monnat said. Rather, the increased deaths most likely were people who had already been struggling with addiction. Some have told her research team that suspensions of evictions and extended unemployment benefits left them with more money than usual. And they said “when I have money, I stock up on my (drug) supply,” she said.
Overdose deaths are just one facet of what was overall the deadliest year in U.S. history. With about 378,000 deaths attributed to COVID-19, the nation saw more than 3.3 million deaths.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reviewed death certificates to come up with the estimate for 2020 drug overdose deaths. The estimate of over 93,000 translates to an average of more than 250 deaths each day, or roughly 11 every hour.
The 21,000 increase is the biggest year-to-year jump since the count rose by 11,000 in 2016.
More historical context: According to the CDC, there were fewer than 7,200 total U.S. overdose deaths reported in 1970, when a heroin epidemic was raging in U.S. cities. There were about 9,000 in 1988, around the height of the crack epidemic.
The CDC reported that in 2020 drug overdoses increased in all but two states, New Hampshire and South Dakota.
Kentucky’s overdose count rose 54% last year to more than 2,100, up from under 1,400 the year before. There were also large increases in South Carolina, West Virginia and California. Vermont had the largest jump, of about 58%, but smaller numbers — 118 to 186.
The proliferation of fentanyl is one reason some experts do not expect any substantial decline in drug overdose deaths this year. Though national figures are not yet available, there is data emerging from some states that seems to support their pessimism. Rhode Island, for example, reported 34 overdose deaths in January and 37 in February — the most for those months in at least five years.
Texas Dems recently pulled one of the most pathetic political stunts in recent years when they attempted to “filibuster” voting laws by fleeing the state. Unsurprisingly the low IQ dems didn’t count the quorum correctly and the bill passed anyways without them.
The Texas state Senate approved a sweeping election reform bill Tuesday night, one day after dozens of House Democrats fled the state to prevent the chamber from taking up the legislation.
The state Senate approved the bill on an 18-4 party-line vote. Nine Senate Democrats had joined 51 of their House colleagues in hightailing it to Washington, DC, though this was not enough to deny the upper chamber a quorum.
However, the legislation is now stalled due to the absence of a quorum in the House.
Republicans say the measures in the bill — which include ending drive-thru and 24-hour polling places, banning ballot drop boxes, and empowering partisan poll watchers — are designed to ensure the integrity of the vote by preventing voter fraud. Democrats say they make it harder for poor people and minorities to cast ballots.
Most of the Democratic legislators flew to Washington on two chartered planes Monday, defying threats by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott to have them arrested and forced into the legislative chamber for this month’s special session. Abbott has vowed to continue to call special sessions until next year’s elections, if necessary, until the election reform bill is passed.
Earlier Tuesday, the Texas House voted 76-4 to direct its Sergeant-at-Arms to send for all absentee members by “warrant of arrest if necessary.” After the vote, the chamber doors were locked. Four House Democrats who did not go to Washington were among the lawmakers still inside, while the voting mechanisms on the desks of those absent were locked.
State Rep. Eddie Morales, one of the four Democrats who remained, told reporters it was unlikely authorities dispatched to track down any absent lawmakers would travel outside the state to do so.
“I was told they will go to your home back in your district, they will go to your place of work, they will go to your apartment in Austin or wherever you live close by when you’re in session,” he said. “And also family and friends that they may know of.”
While in Washington, the Texas Democrats have pushed for Congress to pass two pieces of federal election reform legislation: the For The People Act, and the John Lewis Voting Rights Act. They met Tuesday with Vice President Kamala Harris and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY).
“These folks are going to be remembered on the right side of history,” Schumer told reporters. “The governor and the Republican legislators will be remembered on the dark and wrong side of history.”
The best part of it all is that Abbott alluded that the fleeing Dems “will have a nice escort” when they return and still be arrested, watch below:
A message shared by the managing director of Thiel Capital, Eric Weinstein, shows Twitter is blocking users from interacting with tweets deemed “misleading.”
In a screenshot shared by Weinstein, a message from Twitter says they’re limiting interaction with the post he tried to like.
“We try to prevent a Tweet like this that otherwise breaks the Twitter Rules from reaching more people, so we’ve disabled most of the ways to engage with it. If you want to talk about it, you can still Retweet with comment,” the message states.
“Just verified that this is real,” Weinstein captions the tweet, going to say he attempted to like the forbidden tweet to test if he’d get the message.
“I guess I don’t usually go out of my way to Like tweets that Twitter dislikes. But I did just that here on purpose as some people had been complaining, and saw this type of message for the first time,” Weinstein added.
“Not sure what to make of this. How typical is this?”
Evidently the original offending tweet was merely someone relating their opinion on vaccine passports, vaccines and lockdowns.
Rather than employ this bizarre form of censorship, why would Twitter not have the user delete the tweet entirely?
The insanity was pointed out by users, who highlighted how the platform is shaping users’ opinions for them.
A London library hiring a rainbow-colored man with a swinging dildo to encourage kids to read underscores the agenda to sexualize children hiding in plain view.
The now-viral footage shows the performer, now popularly known as the “Rainbow Dildo Butt Monkey,” flailing his fake penis at passing vehicles outside of Goodmayes Library in East London.
This incident, where openly gay & flamboyant men chose to attend an event for children is becoming a common occurrence across the globe.
From “Drag Queen Story Hour” to now rainbow-colored freaks swinging dildos in front of kids, the globalists’ anti-human agenda of sexualizing children is becoming more brazen every day.
Stateside, the San Francisco gay choir just openly admitted: “We’re coming for them, we’re coming for your children.”
Disturbingly, some members of that choir appear to be convicted pedophiles, according to research conducted by The Western Journal.
While the matches could be coincidental — some offenders may just happen to have the same name as members of the choir — The Western Journal unearthed at least four credible matches…
Each of the men with matched names of members of the choir has been convicted of “lewd or lascivious acts with a child under 14 years of age.”
Following massive outrage, The library issued an apology saying “this will never happen again.”
The FBI has recently made posts on various social media, recommending that “family members and peers” turn people in to the FBI if they suspect them of “homegrown violent extremism”.
“Family members and peers are often best positioned to witness signs of mobilization to violence. Help prevent homegrown violent extremism. Visit https://go.usa.gov/x6mjf to learn how to spot suspicious behaviors and report them to the #FBI. #NatSec“
The Twitter post also includes a link to a booklet put out by the Department of National Intelligence (DNI), telling what warning signs to look for in your friends and loved ones.
The “indicators” in the booklet are ranked, some of them being “highly diagnostic on their own”, others “require one or more other indicators to gain diagnosticity [sic].” As well, the booklet concluded with “risk factors” to watch out for in others.
About 100 suspected cases of GBS — among 12.8 million people who have gotten the J&J shot — have been identified in the federal government’s database.
FDA is preparing to add a warning to Johnson & Johnson’s Covid-19 vaccine after receiving preliminary reports of patients developing the rare neurological condition Guillain-Barré syndrome after receiving the shot, a senior CDC official confirmed to NANN.
About 100 suspected cases of GBS — among the 12.8 million people who have gotten the J&J shot — have been identified in the federal government’s database for adverse side effects after vaccination, the official said.
Number of Deaths Reported After COVID Vaccines Jumps by More Than 2,000 in 1 Week, According to VAERS
VAERS data released today by the CDC showed a total of 438,441 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 9,048 deaths and 41,015 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 2, 2021.
This week’s data for 12- to 17-year-olds show:
- 13,385 total adverse events, including 801 rated as serious and 14 reported deaths among 12- to 17-year-olds. Two of the nine deaths were suicides.
- The most recent reported death includes a 13-year-old boy (VAERS I.D. 1431289) with a previous history of COVID who suffered cardiac arrest and died 17 days after vaccination with Pfizer.Other reports include a 13-year-old boy (VAERS I.D. 1406840) who died two days after receiving a Pfizer vaccine, three 15-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1187918, 1382906 and 1242573), four 16-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1420630, 1426828, 1225942 and 1386841) and three 17-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1199455, 1388042 and 1420762).
- 1,934 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds with 99% of cases
attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine, 1.1% to Moderna and 0.2% (or four cases) to J&J.
- 347 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation) with 343 attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
- 57 reports of blood clotting disorders, 56 attributed to Pfizer and 1 attributed to Moderna.
This week’s total VAERS data, from Dec. 14, 2020 to July 2, 2021, for all age groups show:
- 22% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
- 50% of those who died were male, 45% were female and the remaining death reports did not include gender of the deceased.
- The average age of death was 74.7.
- As of July 2, 2,678 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 994 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.
- Of the 4,456 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 59% were attributed to Pfizer vaccinations, 39% to Moderna vaccine and 7% to J&J.
- 398 reports of Guillain-Barré Syndrome, with 47% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 40% to Moderna and 19% to J&J.
- 121,092 reports of anaphylaxis with 46% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine, 46% to Moderna and 7% to J&J.
- 8,256 reports of blood clotting disorders. Of those, 3,959 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 2,699 reports to Moderna and 1,552 reports to J&J.
- 1,796 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis with 1,177 cases attributed to Pfizer, 563 cases to Moderna and 52 cases to J&J’s COVID vaccine.
Pfizer says boosters needed, U.S. federal health agencies, scientists disagree
As The Defender reported today, U.S. federal health agencies and the maker of one of the most popular COVID vaccines are publicly at odds over if or when fully vaccinated people will need a third “booster” dose.
Pfizer announced Thursday it will seek Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA in August for a third dose of its COVID vaccine. The drugmaker predicted those who have been fully vaccinated will need a booster shot within six to 12 months of receiving their second dose of the Pfizer vaccine.
But the U.S.Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) hours later issued a joint statement by the FDA and Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention (CDC) saying, “Americans who have been fully vaccinated do not need a booster shot at this time.”Tell Schools/Universities No Vaccine Mandates for Children/Young Adults!
The HHS statement did not explicitly mention Pfizer, but said “a science-based, rigorous process” headed by the CDC, FDA and the National Institutes of Health would determine when or whether boosters were necessary.
Pfizer’s assertions about the need for boosters contradict other research, and several experts pushed back against the claim.
“There’s really no indication for a third booster or a third dose of an mRNA vaccine, given the variants that we have circulating at this time,” Dr. Céline Gounder, an infectious disease specialist at Bellevue Hospital Center in New York, told the New York Times. “In fact, many of us question whether you will ever need boosters.”
“No one is saying we’ll never need a booster, but to say we need it now and give the public the impression the vaccines are failing and something needs to be done as a matter of urgency. … The time isn’t now. The decisions that are going to be made will be made by federal agencies.”
Pfizer and BioNTech are developing a version of their COVID vaccine that targets the Delta variant, The New York Times reported this week. The companies expect to begin clinical trials of the vaccine in August.
Pfizer and BioNTech reported — based on their own studies that have not been published, nor peer-reviewed, according to the Times — that a booster given six months after the second dose of vaccine increased the potency of antibodies against the original virus and the Beta variant by five- to tenfold.
Vaccine efficacy may decline six months after immunization, the companies said in a news release, and booster doses may be needed to fend off virus variants. The vaccine makers said they will submit their findings to the FDA in the coming weeks, a step toward gaining authorization for booster shots.
17-year-old student required to get vaccinated suffers heart condition
Concerns around COVID vaccines and heart inflammation, especially in young males, continue to circulate. But according to an update posted today on the CDC website, the agency’s researchers have concluded the benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks of myocarditis after vaccination.
European drug regulators today announced they also have found a “possible link” between a “very rare heart inflammation” and the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, but sided with U.S. regulators, saying they also believe the benefits of the shots outweighed any risks.
Meanwhile, The Defender continues to report on teens who have experienced heart issues after taking the vaccines — including a 17-year-old student who developed symptoms of a heart condition about one week after his first dose of Pfizer’s COVID and subsequently was diagnosed with a heart condition.
The teen’s father, Fabio Berlingieri, told “Fox & Friends” his son had COVID and recovered, but was required to get the vaccine in order to play soccer.
“We are steadfastly committed to keeping politics out of the effort to get every American vaccinated so that we can save lives and help our economy further recover,” White House spokesperson Kevin Munoz said in a lie before announcing the most political things they have done yet.
‘Biden allied groups, including the Democratic National Committee, are also planning to engage fact-checkers more aggressively and work with SMS carriers to dispel misinformation about vaccines that is sent over social media and text messages. The goal is to ensure that people who may have difficulty getting a vaccination because of issues like transportation see those barriers lessened or removed entirely.’ according to Politico.
After Federal documents leaked earlier this week showing a DHS Training Program Preparing For Rural Lockdowns and Mass Public Quarantines Against Unvaccinated the administration really lost support for their fascist style door-to-door approach. So now they are once again relying on big tech to manipulate the weak minded.
The accusation was the latest development in Carlson’s claims that the NSA was spying on him, triggering a rare statement from the intelligence agency denying that the Fox News personality was an intelligence target, but not denying he was spied on. The agency also denied Carlson’s claim that it was attempting to force his show off the air.
According to Axios Tucker Carlson was talking to U.S.-based Kremlin intermediaries about setting up an interview with Vladimir Putin shortly before the Fox News host accused the National Security Agency of spying on him, sources familiar with the conversations.
Two sources familiar with Carlson’s communications said his two Kremlin intermediaries live in the United States, but the sources could not confirm whether both are American citizens or whether both were on U.S. soil at the time they communicated with Carlson.
If one of them was a foreign national and on foreign soil during the communications, the U.S. government wouldn’t necessarily have had to seek approval to monitor their communications.
The NSA spied on Tucker Carlson for reaching out through proper channels to interview Putin, just like NBC did only a few weeks ago. The NSA unmasked an American citizen for doing his job.
This confirms Tucker Carlson’s claim that his private journalistic correspondence was leaked to media outlets by the NSA.
A journalist calls Tucker Carlson just before air last night and says US intelligence agents are distributing his emails and proceeds to repeat back words from an email known only to Tucker, the email recipient, and Tucker‘s executive producer.
President Donald Trump, who was kicked off Twitter, Facebook and other social media platforms earlier this year, announced class-action lawsuits Wednesday against Facebook, Twitter and Google as well as their CEOs.
The legal effort will be supported by the America First Policy Institute, a nonprofit formed earlier this year by alumni of the Trump administration.
“Today, in conjunction with the American First Policy Institute, I’m filing as the lead class representative, a major class action lawsuit against the big tech giants including Facebook, Google and Twitter as well as their CEOs, Mark Zuckerberg, Sundar Pichai and Jack Dorsey. Three real nice guys,” Trump said with a note of sarcasm from Bedminster, New Jersey.
The legal filings indicate that the suit against Google targets its subsidiary YouTube.
“We’re asking the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida to order an immediate halt to stop social media companies’ illegal and shameful censorship of the American people. That’s exactly what they’re doing.
“We’re demanding an end to the shadow banning, a stop to the silencing, a stop to the blacklisting, banishing and canceling that you know so well,” he added.
Trump accused the big tech companies of violating Americans’ First Amendment rights by selectively censoring information.
Former President Donald Trump was banned from Twitter, Facebook and other social media platforms earlier this year.
A representative for Twitter declined to comment. Facebook did not immediately return The Post’s request.
Trump added that he’s asking the court to impose punitive damages against the companies.
“We’re going to hold big tech very accountable,” he said.
Trump added that the team is looking to reform Section 230, which legally protects social media companies from content their users post and how they moderate their platforms.
Trump added that the legal team is “not looking to settle.”
On Jan. 8, two days after the riot at the US Capitol, Twitter took the unprecedented step of permanently banning then-President Trump’s world-famous account from the platform.
Facebook also kicked Trump off its social media platforms around the same time, saying the ban would last at least through the end of his presidency. The company later sent the case to its Oversight Board to rule on whether the ban should be permanent.
In May, the Oversight Board upheld the company’s decision to block Trump, but said an indefinite ban was inappropriate and gave Facebook six months to lay out clearer penalties.
Facebook announced last month that the ban will last at least until 2023, when the decision will be reassessed.
After that announcement, Trump blasted Facebook for “censoring and silencing” his political movement.
“Facebook’s ruling is an insult to the record-setting 75M people, plus many others, who voted for us in the 2020 Rigged Presidential Election,” Trump said. “They shouldn’t be allowed to get away with this censoring and silencing, and ultimately, we will win. Our Country can’t take this abuse anymore!”
Several Republical lawmakers also backed Trump, accusing tech giants of a double standard, pointing out that Democrats including Hillary Clinton also challenged the validity of past election results.
“Unless Congress acts, Big Tech is going to continue to censor Americans and trample on our foundational principles of free speech and open exchange of ideas in an effort to control what Americans say, hear, and think,” Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.) said at the time. “Despite recently being exposed for wrongly banning and suppressing information regarding the origins of COVID-19, Facebook is now doubling down on its censorship playbook.”
Hagerty and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) have both introduced legislation in Congress aimed at reeling in the power of big tech companies.
Members of both political parties in Congress historically supported reforms to laws governing Big Tech firms such as Amazon, Google, Facebook and Twitter. For example, both President Biden and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) backed repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which grants immunity for most third-party online content.
Donald Trump makes a PROMISE not a threat to Zuckerberg that he will be having an “all business” talk with him.
“This suggests that the main database for all election related data for the November 2020 General Election has been removed.”
Maricopa County officials deleted a directory full of election databases right before the election equipment was delivered to the audit. And now they deny they have the router passwords.
Maricopa County deleted a directory full of election databases from the 2020 election cycle days before the election equipment was delivered to the audit. This is spoliation of evidence!
We have recently discovered that the entire “Database” directory from the D drive of the machine “EMSPrimary” has been deleted. This removes election related details that appear to have been covered by the subpoena. In addition, the main database for the Election Management System (EMS) Software, “Results Tally and Reporting,” is not located anywhere on the EMSPrimary machine, even though all of the EMS Clients reference that machine as the location of the database. This suggests that the main database for all election-related data for the November 2020 General Election has been removed. Can you please advise as to why these folders were deleted, and whether there are any backups that may contain the deleted folders?
If you’re cultured in the internet even a little bit you know memes run the world. Doge Coin is no joke tho. Real people are being made billionaires thanks to the “meme” crypto. What better community to support a crypto currency than the meme community?
Doge has recently been exploding and hitting all time highs as it gets more exposure from people like Ben Baller, Elon Musk, and now Snoop Dogg.
Over the past week Bitcoin has seen over a 163.78% increase in price per coin.
Wall Streets Bet Chairman and Ben Baller host a dogecoin talk show on twitter that has been gaining popularity. Tonight they hit over 9,000 live listeners for the first time at around 1am.
Elon musk even joined in to listen. Elon is a huge advocate for dogecoin and is expected to mention it during his SNL apparently this Saturday.
I imagine that most people reading this article will be familiar with the phrase “Liberalism is a mental disorder.” The apparent link between mental illness and political Leftism (of all strains) is not a revolutionary observation. For centuries, various thinkers from across the political spectrum have come to similar conclusions with regards to the psychological stability of Leftists — or lack thereof.
Psychological analysis of Leftism is a prominent theme throughout the works of Ted Kaczynski. For him, Leftism is the quintessential example of modern ‘oversocialization.’ An inferiority complex cult, overflowing with a spectrum of mental illnesses; self-hatred, guilt, low self-esteem, depressive tendencies, defeatism, etc. Kaczynski notes that Leftists have an intense need to identify with the “weak, defeated, repellent or otherwise inferior” and an intense loathing for everything that is “strong and successful.” He describes them as the System’s first line of defense; they swarm any potentially-revolutionary movement that may threaten the System’s power, pollute it with nonsense, and drag it away from its foundational cause.
[See: Technological Slavery (2010)].
In 1938, Antonio Vallejo-Nájera, head of Franco’s Military Psychiatric Services, was commissioned to study the personality and psychology of Communist prisoners. Although Vallejo-Nájera did not consider Communists to be innately mentally ill, he identified that the majority of subjects had innately “mentally inferior” and degenerative psychological characteristics. This included poor temperament, mediocre intelligence, schizoid tendencies, clumsiness, and a lack of spontaneity and initiative. Similarly to Kaczynski, Vallejo-Nájera noted that envy, social resentment, and frustrated aspirations formed the foundation of the Marxist worldview. Interestingly, he observed that these negative psychological traits appeared to be amplified in female Leftists, a trend that certainly parallels our own era. After years of study, Vallejo-Nájera concluded that the chance of changing the political attitudes of Leftists was extremely low
Perhaps the most renowned and in-depth psychological analysis of Leftism to date comes via the 130-year-old works of one of the World’s most misunderstood and misappropriated philosophers: Friedrich Nietzsche. Although Nietzsche does not explicitly name the Leftists, the ‘Slave Moralist’ archetype — as described throughout the entirety of Nietzsche’s bibliography from ‘Beyond Good and Evil’ onwards — bears all of the identifiable hallmarks of Leftism. From moral framework to psychology, to physical type; every characteristic that Nietzsche attributes to the Slave Moralist is analogous to the archetypal Leftist, both of our current age and throughout history.
[See: Nietzsche’s bibliography from 1886 onwards].
[They] dared to invert the aristocratic value equations, good = noble = beautiful = happy = favored-of-the-gods and maintain, with the furious hatred of the underprivileged and impotent, that “only the poor, the powerless, are good; only the suffering, sick and ugly, truly blessed. But you, noble and mighty ones of earth will be, to all eternity, the evil, the cruel, the avaricious, the godless, and thus the cursed and the damned!”
They do not call themselves the weak, they call themselves the “good.”NIETZSCHE — ON THE GENEALOGY OF MORALITY (1887), ANTI-CHRIST (1888, PUB. 1895)
More contemporarily, Rich Houck made a well-cited case for Leftism-as-mental-illness via his 2018 work ‘Liberalism Unmasked.’ He identified several common indicators of mental illness that are consistently exhibited, to varying degrees, by Leftists. These included: delusion, hypocrisy, projection, deceitfulness (lying, exaggerating, omitting, etc.), irrationality, unnecessary aggression when doubted, inability to accept new information, and feelings of victimization, self-hatred, and persecution.
[See chapter: ‘Diagnostic criteria of a mental illness’ from Liberalism Unmasked (2018)].
Throughout every psychological analysis of Leftism, we find a handful of recurring themes:
- Inferiority complex
- Perceived persecution
Statistical Support for ‘Leftism as Mental Illness’
Every study done on the subject shows the same outcome with the data: Liberalism is a mental illness. It really isn’t just a right wing insult, it is statistically, factually, and patently true. A comprehensive study on the issue of Leftist mental illness was conducted this year by Emil Kirkegaard [See: ‘Mental illness and the left’]. The study used less abstract criteria than the aforementioned thinkers, and consisted of straight-to-the-point questions, which essentially boiled down to “are you mentally ill, yes or no?”
Data Abstract: A search of the available variables resulted in 5 items measuring one’s own mental illness (e.g., ”Do you have any emotional or mental disability?”). All of these items were weakly associated with left-wing political ideology as measured by self-report, with especially high rates seen for the “extremely liberal” group. These results mostly held up in regressions that adjusted for age, sex, and race. For the variable with the most data (n = 11,338), the difference in the mental illness measure between “extremely liberal” and “extremely conservative” was 0.39 d. Temporal analysis showed that the relationship between mental illness, happiness, and political ideology has existed in the GSS data since the 1970s and still existed in the 2010s. Within-study meta-analysis of all the results found that extreme liberals had a 150% increased rate of mental illness compared to moderates. The finding of increased mental illness among left-wingers is congruent with numerous findings based on related constructs, such as positive relationships between conservatism, religiousness and health in general.
Mental health: Initial data, Left vs Right
The first figure (below) represents data from a 2020 Slate Star Codex (SSC) reader survey, in which respondents rated their mental health and political affiliation.
As the SSC data may have been biased, with an over-representation of ethnic Europeans and highly intelligent individuals, Kirkegaard replicated the analysis using more representative samples taken from the General Social Survey (GSS https://gss.norc.org/), a “public access large-scale survey with relevant data,” with a total sample size of 64,814. The data used was taken from the cumulative cross-sectional file 1972-2018 (release 1), available for public use [source].
It’s pretty close to other ‘by-ideology’ population breakdowns. Radical Leftists constitute approximately 5-15% of the US population, approximately 50 million people.
Mental health: Left vs Right, male vs female
Validating the observations of Antonio Vallejo-Nájera, the study found that women, in general, have much poorer mental health than men, with Leftist women having the greatest number of mental health problems, by far.
Mental health: Left vs Right
Mental health: By party affiliation
Probably not as strong of an indicator as the 1-10 (Far-Left vs Far-Right) political scale, but mirrors the same trend.
Average happiness: Left vs Right, male vs female
Leftists also reported lower average happiness levels. This also confirms the theory that part of the reason these types of people are so attracted to liberalism is because of self loathing and jealousy. (I don’t know many liberals that have boats, boats are very popular among conservatives for example)
Mental health: Final meta-analysis
Kirkegaard’s concluding statement: “The results confirm the general pattern from before, namely that there is a strongly elevated risk for mental illness among the extreme liberals (+150%), a small increase among the liberals and slightly liberals (+29 to 32%), and somewhat lower rates among conservatives and extreme conservatives (-17 to 24%). Breaking the pattern, slightly conservatives had a marginally increased rate (+6%). A variant of this analysis was also carried out by including the happiness metrics reverse-coded. This produced materially the same pattern, but was weaker since the happiness items had a weaker relationship with political ideology than the mental illness variables.”
Supplementary Statistics: Political stances, Left vs Right
It would be fallacious to suggest, for example, that an aversion to marriage is an intrinsic aspect of mental illness. However, the fact that all of the socially and biologically destructive political agendas of our age* are most fervently supported by those with the greatest propensity for mental illness cannot be overlooked, and the significance of this fact cannot be overstated.
Not a “policy” per se, but ethnocentrism (in-group bias/preference) is by far the most important factor to consider in our current political climate. Brainwashed (anti-)White Leftists are almost single-handedly dragging our entire civilization and race down the path of destruction.
The chart below shows liberals more and more believe black people are not equal to them. Liberals can not explain or show what is causing black people to not achieve as much as them, this would be because it is the liberals holding back the black community. Could you imagine a liberal admitting they are racist? thats’s why these problems haven’t been fixed and continue to get worse.
Marriage and Family
Leftists are less likely to be married, be happy in marriage, and support marriage in general. This is no surprise knowing liberals are marxist who want to destroy the nuclear family because most liberals aren’t successful and skilled enough to support a happy family. The jealousy of Liberals knowing conservative values lead to more happy families makes the liberals want to destroy families.
Leftists are overwhelmingly pro-abortion (also known as being ‘anti-life’). Abortion is also the number one killer of black people – No wonder white liberals love abortion. While there are some circumstances abortions are warranted (health reasons, pregnancies from rape, and other specific situations) Meanwhile liberals think abortion should continue to increase. Despite have less babies than white people liberals have encouraged black mothers to get FAR MORE abortions than other races. White liberals are supporting the GENOCIDE of black babies.
Leftists are overwhelmingly urbanites and support increased urbanization. As we know almost every urban area is democrat controlled and has seen increasing crime rates for 75+ years under liberal policies. Liberals are supporting the destruction of their own cities.
Leftists overwhelmingly support LGBT. This is no surprise since we know most “public” members of the LGBT community are attention grifters who lived such a good life as a white liberal they have to “transgender” to become a member of an “oppressed” group. It allows liberals to have a victim mentality and blame “who they are” and “society” for all of their life failures. Liberals are doing a MAJOR disservice to people who actually are gay or lesbian.
Liberals also admit they don’t believe in or understand basic human biology.
Liberals love labels. Gay marriage isn’t needed to have a gay relationship for example. Yet it’s not about being in a happy relationship for liberals, it’s about taking, it’s about the label. They want to change definitions. I personally have no problem with gay “marriage” but for 2000 years marriage meant a joining between a man and woman. No real gay person would want a straight label for themselves. Real gays would rather have their own form of marriage to represent their sexual preference. Liberals just want to muddy the waters of what marriage, gender, and biology is.
Leftists overwhelmingly oppose religion, and find no meaning in spirituality. Although liberals are EXTREMELY likely to believe rocks from the internet have spiritual powers and abilities don’t forget these are the same people that believe the month you’re born in decides your character traits. I am atheist but I understand the importance of religion and it’s teachings. Liberals could learn a thing or two from the bible wether there is a God or not.
Leftists want to ban guns. The hypocrisy continues with this one since we know the VAST VAST MAJORITY of gun violence happens in Liberal urban areas. Areas where liberals have already implemented stricter gun laws have seen more and more illegal gun violence. Gun control has made gun violence worse for 75+ years straight in liberal cities yet liberals aren’t smart enough to realize gun control doesn’t work yet. While there is no way to statistically prove this its safe to say most liberals are pussies so that inherit fear helps liberal politicians trick liberals weak minds into being anti gun.
Leftists endorse the expansion of government power. These are the same marxist and socialist beliefs we saw that led to the holocaust and even more dying under communism. Liberal’s are modern day NAZI’s and not smart enough to realize they are supporting the same things the NAZI’s did to put Hitler in power.
Data Shows Liberals are embarrassingly wrong about COVID
Other polls show liberals have bought into the mainstream media’s panic porn surrounding COVID-19 more than other ideologies, also causing them more stress and fear.
The vast majority of Democrats overestimate the probability of being hospitalized and dying from COVID-19, compared to other ideologies, a Gallup survey found. There’s only a 1 to 5% chance of somebody with COVID-19 having to be hospitalized, yet 41% of Democrats’ believe there’s a greater than 50% chance. Only 10% of Democrat respondents in the survey knew the correct answer.
Liberal’s Low IQ is causing them to believe misinformation and spread it
Misinformation may also be fueling their decline in mental health. Americans who identify as liberal or very liberal believe 1,000 or more unarmed Black men were murdered by police in 2019, according to a survey produced by Skeptic.com. In reality, only 12 were. Yet, this perception reinforces their belief in their “White privilege,” and continued self-loathing.
New PEW Research Study Shows More White Liberals Are Becoming Mentally Ill
liberals are far more likely than all other ideological-racial subgroups to report being diagnosed with a mental health condition.
Overall, and with one exception (white moderates), those in 18-29 age group are more likely to report being diagnosed with a mental health condition. The differences among white liberals, though, are striking: almost half of white liberals in this cohort report a diagnosis.
A summary of the data shows liberals are anti-life, anti-rights, and anti-freedom. It is hard to believe liberals actually want to destroy they Earth, what’s more likely is that Liberals are weak minded, emotional, and easy to trick. Liberals are supporting their own down fall without realizing it.
Does supporting ‘Leftist’ policies cause an individual to become mentally ill? Probably not. Do these policies appeal to those who have a greater propensity for mental illness? Evidently so. Are there external factors at work that may simultaneously damage an individual’s mental health while also driving them towards Leftist ideology? Undoubtedly so.
The current globalist superstructure — the System, New World Order, world government, whichever moniker you prefer — has been consciously designed to cultivate the worst behavioral traits imaginable. The System intentionally raises up dysfunctional people who, in the past (or in a healthy society), would either have had their anti-social behavior corrected by cultural pressure, or have been cast out of society, exiled, “oppressed,” and so on.
The globalist oligarchy aims to disrupt society and dismantle every foundation upon which a strong populace is built: family, religion, health, fitness, culture, national spirit, etc. By creating as many dysfunctional people as possible, the rootless oligarchs ensure their continued dominance. A mentally ill, weak, flabby, nihilistic, and disunified populace poses no threat to them and their system. Every aspect of the modern world is designed to demoralize and spiritually crush you.
All of that being said, the phenomenon of ‘Leftist’ behavior cannot be attributed to the System alone, given that individuals who fit the ‘Leftist’ archetype have existed throughout much of recorded history.
Bonus: Liberals getting eaten by the rich
It’s no secret to anyone but liberals that liberals are enslaved by the mega-corporations they think they are fighting against. The billionaires of the world own and control the mentally ill liberals.
On twitter today representative Ruben seemed to have some type of schizophrenic episode publicly. See the tweet below.
Schizophrenic Liberals and Blue Anon conspiracy theorist have continued to push their crazy conspiracies. Liberals believe there is a secret group attempting to make Donald Trump a dictator called Q anon. We are not sure if liberals actually believe they have seen a Q anon in real life or if the memory of Q anon has been implanted into their brains by the liberal media hoaxes.
During the Protest Ruben is refereeing to the only death related to it was a single unarmed protestor being shot in the neck by capitol police. Nobody else was assaulted or threatened as schizophrenic Ruben falsely remembers.